The Nefarious Use Of Race Fear To Prevent Local Elections Must End
December 24, 2018
THE NEFARIOUS USE OF RACE FEAR TO PREVENT LOCAL ELECTIONS MUST END
It is paramount to pursue local elections (municipal elections) because it substantially increases Malaysia’s democratisation.
The government’s objection to it has been only one — the threat of racial strife. This is pure fear-mongering, or worst, evidence of weak national leadership.
There are three examples of countries with a history of ethnic conflict far worse than ours but that have persisted with local elections: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Sri Lanka and Rwanda.
Bosnia has had six local elections since war ended following the Dayton Peace Accords in 1995. The first was held two years after peace in 1997. This involved 142 municipalities and in the last one in 2016, nearly three thousand candidates.
Sri Lanka elected 8,293 members earlier this year to the country's 341 local authorities (24 municipal councils, 41 urban councils and 276 divisional councils). The Sri Lankan civil war that raged from 1982 to 2005 did not convince past or present Sri Lankan governments to remove the third vote.
Rwanda held in late 2017 local council elections for 15,014 positions. The country where 800,000 people in an ethnic genocide in 1994 does not subscribe to the idea local council elections lead to chaos.
All three have horrible chapters in their history, but they do not blame local level elections for any new racial strife. Rather, they look at local councils to concretise democracy.
Malaysia has to move away from a culture of fear as a reason to avoid representation, public discourse and localised decision-making.
There is no denying that Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is no fan of local elections.
The proponents of authoritarian democracy are dismissive of the third and even second vote. They prefer federated states to rely on central government for operation budgets and growth, and local councils to remain under the federal ministry for operating budgets and dependent on their authority.
They want all power vested in the PM’s Cabinet post-election.
This emasculates politics in the country and blocks off plurality in voices and opinions when it comes to power.
That is the wrong direction for the country.
Finally, it is regrettable DAP leaders have tried to assuage perceived objections to local elections by assuring Malay dominance overall in the proposed elections. There are no guarantees in any election, except that the winners will be chosen by the people and not anointed by political leaders who have their own interests.
That’s all what local councils determine, the legitimate consent from residents for their respective councils.
Praba Ganesan Chief Executive KUASA (mobile +60133939484)